State law grants the divorce. Federal law controls the retirement, the survivor annuity and TRICARE. We handle both for families stationed in the Lowcountry.
Military divorce in South Carolina runs on two sets of rules at once: state law decides the divorce, custody and support, while federal law controls the retirement, the survivor annuity and TRICARE. Here is how both apply to families stationed in the Charleston area.
A South Carolina court can hear your divorce while you are stationed here: S.C. Code § 20-3-30 counts continuous presence on active duty as residency. Dividing the military retirement is a separate question — 10 U.S.C. § 1408(c)(4) needs residence apart from the assignment, domicile, or consent. Hall & Means represents service members and military spouses from our West Ashley office in Charleston, SC.
Yes — S.C. Code § 20-3-30 has a sentence written for you. The general rule is one year of residence, or three months if both spouses are South Carolina residents when the action is commenced. It then defines its terms: “residents” or “resided,” as applied to a plaintiff or defendant “stationed in this State on active duty military service,” means “a continuous presence in this State for the period required regardless of intent to permanently remain in South Carolina.” A member domiciled in Texas or Florida satisfies it by presence.
That sentence answers whether South Carolina can grant the divorce, not whether a judge here can divide the retired pay — that is federal, and often no. See how a South Carolina divorce works.
Your duty station does not decide it. S.C. Code § 20-3-60 sends the action to the county “(a) in which the defendant resides at the time of the commencement of the action, (b) in which the plaintiff resides if the defendant is a nonresident or after due diligence cannot be found, or (c) in which the parties last resided together as husband and wife unless the plaintiff is a nonresident, in which case it must be brought in the county in which the defendant resides.” A PCS move, or a change in base housing, is exactly what pulls (a) and (c) apart.
| County | Circuit | Family Court | Phone | Opens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston | 9th | 100 Broad St, Suite 143, Charleston, SC 29401-2265 | (843) 958-4400 | 8:30 |
| Berkeley | 9th | 300-B California Ave, Moncks Corner, SC 29461 | (843) 719-4500 | 9:00 |
| Dorchester | 1st | 212 Deming Way, Summerville, SC 29483 | (843) 832-0360 | 8:30 |
Charleston’s Suite 143 is Family Court, not Suite 106. Berkeley’s “-B” matters: plain 300 California Avenue is the detention center. Dorchester’s Family Court sits in Summerville, not St. George. Verified on the three counties’ own sites, August 25, 2026.
The case runs on paper — South Carolina has no Family Court e-filing. Interim custody or support comes from a temporary hearing under SCRFC Rule 21 as amended, effective October 1, 2025: set no sooner than 21 days and no later than 45 after the request is filed, notice 20 days ahead, the return 10 days ahead, written evidence 5 days ahead. Evidence is confined to affidavits, financial declarations and statutorily required documents such as a parenting plan, though a judge may allow or require more for good cause. The self-represented packet (SCCA 400P SRL-DIV) runs only on the one-year separation ground, and is not closed to parents or property owners — the bar is disagreement. See filing for divorce in Charleston.
Only if it has jurisdiction over the member under federal law. The Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408(c)(1), lets a court treat retired pay as property of the member and spouse “in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction of such court,” and South Carolina treats the marital share as marital property under § 20-3-630 — see how South Carolina divides marital property.
The catch is § 1408(c)(4): a court may not divide retired pay unless it has jurisdiction over the member by reason of “(A) his residence, other than because of military assignment,” “(B) his domicile,” or “(C) his consent.” Residence existing because of the assignment is carved out, so the presence that satisfies § 20-3-30 does not by itself reach the pension. Consent is the everyday route.
| Rule | Cite | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| The 10/10 rule | § 1408(d)(2) | Limits direct payment by DFAS, not entitlement. Without 10 years of marriage over 10 creditable years of service, a court with jurisdiction can still award a marital share; the member then pays it directly. With it, a former spouse may be eligible for direct pay. |
| The frozen benefit | § 1408(a)(4)(B) | Where the decree is final before the member retires, pay for division is figured on “the member’s retired pay base and years of service on the date of the decree,” plus cost-of-living adjustments. Divorces after retirement are unaffected. |
| The caps | § 1408(e)(1), (e)(4)(B) | Statutory, not agency policy. Payments under all court orders may not exceed 50% of disposable retired pay; the aggregate reaches 65% only where support garnishment stacks on a property award. |
| Survivor Benefit Plan | § 1450(f)(3)(C) | No deemed election unless the Secretary concerned receives the former spouse’s request within one year of the court order. |
| Thrift Savings Plan | 5 C.F.R. pt. 1653 | Divided by a Retirement Benefits Court Order, never a QDRO. It must name the Thrift Savings Plan, use defined-contribution terms and identify the civilian or uniformed-services account. A $600 fee comes off before review, and is not refunded. |
The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act slows the case; it does not stop it. Under 50 U.S.C. § 3932 the court “shall, upon application by the servicemember, stay the action for a period of not less than 90 days” when two letters are filed: one from the member on how duty materially affects the ability to appear, naming a date they will be available; one from the commanding officer stating that duty prevents appearance and leave is not authorized. Ninety days is a floor, not a ceiling; both sections reach “any child custody proceeding.”
Where a member never appears, § 3931 governs: the filing spouse files an affidavit on military status, and if the defendant appears to be in service the court may not enter judgment until it appoints an attorney for him.
Two separate South Carolina statutes say it should not. They do different jobs.
| Military Parent Equal Protection Act, §§ 63-5-900 to -950 | Uniform Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act, §§ 63-15-500 to -556 |
|---|---|
| § 63-5-920(A): no final order modifying “the terms establishing custody or visitation contained in an existing order” until “ninety days after the military parent is released from military service”; absence or relocation because of service “must not be the sole factor” in a change of circumstance. | § 63-15-512: a court “may not consider a parent’s past deployment or possible future deployment in itself” in the best-interest analysis, but may weigh any significant impact on the child. |
| § 63-5-920(B): a temporary modification ends on release and the original terms revive. (C): the military parent has custody or visitation during leave. | § 63-15-532: during a deployment the court may let an adult family member, or an adult with a close and substantial relationship to the child, do the caretaking. |
Neither sets a day count for a pre-deployment hearing; both say only “expedite.” The Military Parent Equal Protection Act defines “military service” narrowly — orders that bar a family member from accompanying, and Guard call-ups over thirty consecutive days. Our Charleston child custody attorneys page has the best-interest framework.
Not as property. In Howell v. Howell, 581 U.S. 214 (2017), the Supreme Court held a state court “may not order a veteran to indemnify a divorced spouse for the loss in the divorced spouse’s portion of the veteran’s retirement pay caused by the veteran’s waiver of retirement pay to receive service-related disability benefits,” and that a state cannot avoid Mansell v. Mansell, 490 U.S. 581 (1989), by calling the order a requirement to “reimburse.” 38 U.S.C. § 5301(a)(1) also exempts VA payments from attachment, levy or seizure.
For support, it flips. S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 114-4720(A)(2) defines gross income as income from any source and lists “Veterans’ benefits” by name. Dollars a court cannot divide as property are countable in child support, and through the § 20-3-130(C) factors in the alimony analysis.
| Rule | Requirement | What it provides |
|---|---|---|
| 20/20/20 — § 1072(2)(F) | Unremarried; at the decree, 20 years of marriage over 20 creditable years of service; no employer health coverage | TRICARE as the former spouse’s own sponsor, plus commissary, exchange and MWR |
| 20/20/15, decree before April 1, 1985 — § 1072(2)(G) | 20 years of service and marriage, 15 to under 20 overlapping | TRICARE, no time limit in the statute; no commissary or exchange |
| 20/20/15, decree on or after April 1, 1985 — § 1072(2)(H) | Same requirement, measured at the decree date | TRICARE for one year after the decree only; no commissary or exchange |
Cash allowances count, and so does housing given instead of cash. Regulation 114-4720(A)(3)(C) covers the on-base case: “With regard to military allotments, individuals not receiving Housing allotments should be imputed with the BAH-II amount for dependents.” South Carolina runs Income Shares under § 63-17-470, ceiling $40,000 combined monthly income; see how child support is calculated in South Carolina.
Before any order, each branch imposes its own support obligation through the command. Only the Army’s is readable in full: AR 608-99, Family Support, Child Custody, and Parentage (13 Nov 2020) gives a family member not in government housing, and not covered by an order or agreement, a pro-rata share of BAH RC/T–WITH, and sets interim support at 25% of BAH RC/T–WITH — one-time, with the first 30 days, where the spouse lives somewhere a state court can order support — South Carolina. The others use DAFI 36-2906, MILPERSMAN 1754-030, MCO 5800.16 Volume 9 and COMDTINST M1600.2; we could not read their operative text, so we publish no formulas from them. Command-directed support is a stopgap, not a preview of a court order.
It can advise you; it cannot represent you in Family Court. The 628th Air Base Wing Staff Judge Advocate legal office at Joint Base Charleston (now Joint Base Lindsey Graham) offers legal service to active duty, “retirees and their families,” Guard in Title 10 status and Reserve on active-duty orders — so a military spouse is generally eligible for advice, on subjects that include divorce, separation, child support and dependent care.
But the same fact sheet prohibits “representation of the client in a court or administrative proceeding” — “legal assistance attorneys cannot represent in court.” A spouse who wants representation in Family Court must retain civilian counsel. Two sites: the Air Base, 102 East Hill Blvd, Charleston Air Force Base, SC 29404, (843) 963-5502; the Weapons Station, 2316 Red Bank Rd, Goose Creek, SC 29445, (843) 794-7500. From the installation’s Staff Judge Advocate fact sheet at jbcharleston.jb.mil, August 25, 2026. Venue still runs through the § 20-3-60 prongs, never through the gate you report to: North Charleston spans three counties, Goose Creek is entirely Berkeley County.
Myth vs. rule
No. The 10/10 rule in 10 U.S.C. § 1408(d)(2) limits only whether DFAS pays a former spouse directly. It does not decide whether the retirement is divided. A South Carolina court with jurisdiction can still award a share, and the member pays it.
Not on the assignment alone. Under 10 U.S.C. § 1408(c)(4) a court may divide retired pay only if it has jurisdiction over the member by residence other than because of military assignment, by domicile, or by consent. Being stationed here satisfies § 20-3-30, not § 1408(c)(4).
Not automatically. Under 50 U.S.C. § 3932 the court must stay the case at least 90 days, but only on the servicemember’s application with two letters: one from the member on how duty affects the ability to appear, one from the commanding officer stating leave is not authorized.
Neither rule fits an 18-year marriage. Under 10 U.S.C. § 1072(2)(F) the 20/20/20 rule needs 20 years of marriage overlapping 20 years of creditable service at the final decree. The 20/20/15 rules in § 1072(2)(G) and (H) still need 20 years of marriage and 20 years of service, with 15 to under 20 overlapping.
Hall & Means concentrates in family law and represents clients across Charleston, Berkeley and Dorchester counties from 1816 Belgrade Avenue, Ste. 101, Charleston, SC 29407 (West Ashley). You work directly with Mary Ann Hall or Jessica Means. If orders or a pending retirement drive your timing, say so.
Call (843) 377-1341 or send a confidential message to request a consultation.
Last reviewed: August 25, 2026.
This page is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. South Carolina law changes and every case turns on its specific facts. Consult a licensed South Carolina family-law attorney about your situation.
Get in touch
Submit the form and we'll reply within one business day — by email or phone, whichever you prefer. Everything you share is protected by attorney-client privilege from the first message.
Phone
Office
1816 Belgrade Avenue, Ste. 101
Charleston, SC 29407
Hours
Monday – Friday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM
